From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardiner v. Lo Grande

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1983
455 N.E.2d 663 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided September 27, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, PAUL T. D'AMARO, J., FRANK P. DE LUCA, J.

William R. Bennett, Town Attorney ( Richard P. De Bragga of counsel), for appellants.

Adolph H. Siegel for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 83 A.D.2d 614) (see, e.g., Matter of Circus Disco v New York State Liq. Auth., 51 N.Y.2d 24; see, also, Matter of Pleasant Val. Home Constr. v Van Wagner, 41 N.Y.2d 1028).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Gardiner v. Lo Grande

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 27, 1983
455 N.E.2d 663 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Gardiner v. Lo Grande

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT D.L. GARDINER, Respondent, v. MICHAEL A. LO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 27, 1983

Citations

455 N.E.2d 663 (N.Y. 1983)
455 N.E.2d 663
468 N.Y.S.2d 104

Citing Cases

Straphangers Campaign v. MTA

Finally, any doubts concerning sufficiency must be resolved against the notice. (Matter of Gardiner v Lo…

Rockland Properties v. Town of Brookhaven

In any event, the argument is without merit, since such a provision would be inconsistent with the provisions…