From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fusaro v. Ziemba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1974
46 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

October 28, 1974


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR inter alia to annul a determination of the planning board of the Town of Greenburgh which denied petitioners' application for approval of a subdivision of land, the planning board appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 31, 1973, which granted the application to the extent of vacating the "alleged" determination of the planning board, deeming petitioners' final subdivision plat approved and directing the Town Clerk of the town to issue a certificate. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The issue presented is the timeliness of the Planning Board's decision upon the application for approval of the subdivision plat. According to a letter by the planning board to petitioners, dated October 1, 1973, the decision was made at a regular meeting of the planning board on September 17, 1973, but the meeting minutes show the meeting was held on September 19, 1973. Special Term determined that the decision was made at an executive session and not a regular meeting and that the planning board did not issue a resolution of disapproval within 45 days after the public hearing held on August 15, 1973 as required by subdivision 4 of section 276 Town of the Town Law. This resulted in the approval of the map subdivision by operation of law, by virtue of the passage of time as provided in the Town Law, since the minutes were not reviewed for final determination until October 17, 1973 ( Matter of Fullam v. Kronman, 51 Misc.2d 1079, affd. 31 A.D.2d 947, affd. 26 N.Y.2d 725). The applicable rule is set forth in the text of Anderson, New York Zoning and Practice (2d ed., vol. 1, § 15.07, p. 676) as follows: "The 45 days within which a planning board must make its decision begins to run when the plat is filed with the required endorsements, and the filing fee is paid. The planning board has not acted within the required 45 days if it has voted in executive session, to disapprove, has made no decision in writing, has not informed the applicant, and has not certified its decision to the county clerk. However, a planning board has not failed to act within 45 days simply because it has not filed its decision within that period." The determination of Special Term should accordingly be affirmed. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Fusaro v. Ziemba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1974
46 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Fusaro v. Ziemba

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOMINICK FUSARO et al., Respondents, v. WALTER J. ZIEMBA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1974

Citations

46 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Wallberg v. Planning Bd., Town of Pound Ridge

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Because the appellant Planning Board failed to take any action on petitioner's…

Matter of Pekar v. Town of Veteran Planning Bd.

Upon expiration of the time prescribed, the statute (Town Law, § 276, subd 4) is self-executing. The very…