From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fuffy's Pancake House v. McLaughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1982
88 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

June 21, 1982


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority, dated June 8, 1981 and made after a hearing, which disapproved petitioner's application for an eating-place beer license. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the State Liquor Authority for a new hearing and determination. The determination of the authority must be annulled. There was no evidence in the record to support a finding that Mr. Ianniello, the former principal of petitioner, is involved in petitioner's operation. Further, Mr. De Angelo, the current principal, was not notified of, or given an opportunity to refute charges of alleged violations which occurred in 1980 and 1981. The record also fails to shed any light on Mr. De Angelo's role in, or knowledge of, violations that occurred prior to his becoming the sole principal of petitioner. Since the authority's determination was based, at least in part, on the above, it must be annulled and a new hearing conducted. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Fuffy's Pancake House v. McLaughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1982
88 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Fuffy's Pancake House v. McLaughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FUFFY'S PANCAKE HOUSE, LTD., Doing Business as UMBERTO'S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

RSSM, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

a number of license violations when it operated the premises under the same trade name, resulting in the…

El Corazon Delicatessen, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly concluded that the petitioners…