From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frost v. H.H. Franklin Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1923
142 N.E. 319 (N.Y. 1923)

Opinion

Argued October 2, 1923

Decided October 16, 1923

Carl Sherman, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.

Clarence B. Tippett for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: HOGAN and CRANE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Frost v. H.H. Franklin Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1923
142 N.E. 319 (N.Y. 1923)
Case details for

Matter of Frost v. H.H. Franklin Manufacturing Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRED A. FROST against H.H. FRANKLIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 16, 1923

Citations

142 N.E. 319 (N.Y. 1923)
142 N.E. 319

Citing Cases

Matter of Ognibene v. Rochester Manufacturing Co.

Liberally though the Workmen's Compensation Law is to be construed (§ 21), the courts must give heed to its…

Matter of Miles v. Gibbs Hill, Inc.

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Van Kirk,…