From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Friedgood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1988
137 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 16, 1988

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.).


Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

We find that the court properly held the subject claim to be barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 213). The cause of action accrued on August 9, 1978, the day after which the note became due (see, UCC 3-122 [a]). Since the claimant failed to commence the instant proceeding on or before August 9, 1984, his claim was properly dismissed as untimely.

We have examined the claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Friedgood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1988
137 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Friedgood

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of SOPHIE FRIEDGOOD, Deceased, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Skaneateles Savings Bank v. Modi Associates

We note that UCC article 3 does not contain any Statute of Limitations governing suits on commercial paper.…

Dempster v. Overview Equities, Inc.

Notwithstanding this fact, the appellants contend that extinguishing an antecedent debt constituted fair…