From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frank v. McKenna Dev. Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1989
154 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 30, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that an arbitrator's award will not be vacated unless it is totally irrational, violative of a strong public policy or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on his power (see, Matter of Albany County Sheriff's Local 775 [County of Albany], 63 N.Y.2d 654). Further, "absent provision in the arbitration clause itself, an arbitrator is not bound by principles of substantive law or by rules of evidence" (Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 N.Y.2d 299, 308), and vacatur will not be warranted "even though the court concludes that his interpretation of the agreement misconstrues or disregards its plain meaning or misapplies substantive rules of law" (Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], supra, at 308; see also, Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 N.Y.2d 578, 580).

In the instant case, the arbitrators' interpretation of the parties' contract finding McKenna Development Group liable for the unnecessary removal of certain healthy and otherwise undamaged trees was neither irrational nor in excess of their powers. Accordingly, the award was properly confirmed. Spatt, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Frank v. McKenna Dev. Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1989
154 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Frank v. McKenna Dev. Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWIN FRANK et al., Respondents, v. McKENNA DEVELOPMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
546 N.Y.S.2d 674

Citing Cases

Pearlman v. Pearlman

Thus, an arbitrator's power to resolve a dispute is ordinarily plenary unless expressly limited by the terms…

Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority v. Transport Workers Union of America

Because of the speed and efficiency with which arbitral tribunals generally are able to resolve contractual…