From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 18, 1953
281 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Summary

In Matter of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters (281 App.Div. 934, affd. 306 N.Y. 935), the claimant at certain periods, but not continuously, was engaged in lifting and weighing corrugated board boxes, with lighter duties at other periods. Working for half days during a part of December, 1949, at the handling of boxes, she contracted bursitis in her right shoulder.

Summary of this case from Matter of Kornecki v. City of New York

Opinion

March 18, 1953.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Brewster, Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ. [See post, p. 1051.]


The board has found that claimant contracted bursitis in her right shoulder, an occupational disease, as a result of repeatedly lifting and moving boxes. The evidence is sufficient to present a question of fact and to sustain the finding. While the disease was contracted more than twelve months prior to disablement, claimant continued in the same employment with the same employer from the time the disease was contracted until the time of her disablement. The fact that she may not have done precisely the same kind of work during all of that time does not remove her from the "same employment". Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 18, 1953
281 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

In Matter of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters (281 App.Div. 934, affd. 306 N.Y. 935), the claimant at certain periods, but not continuously, was engaged in lifting and weighing corrugated board boxes, with lighter duties at other periods. Working for half days during a part of December, 1949, at the handling of boxes, she contracted bursitis in her right shoulder.

Summary of this case from Matter of Kornecki v. City of New York
Case details for

Matter of Frank v. Freedman Die Cutters, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JEAN FRANK, Respondent, against FREEDMAN DIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1953

Citations

281 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kornecki v. City of New York

In Matter of Rocha v. Otis Elevator Co. (279 App.Div. 829, motion for leave to appeal denied 303 N.Y. 1015),…

Matter of Biederman v. Liebmann Breweries, Inc.

On merger of corporations the rule generally is that the possessor corporation shall assume all the…