From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Franco v. Velez, Cremonese

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 967 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued August 26, 1985

Decided August 28, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Joseph DiFede, J.

Stanley Schlein and Gerald Sheiowitz for appellants.

Ruben Franco, pro se, and Ricardo Oquendo for Ruben Franco, respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division found that 21 volumes were submitted by respondent. They were numbered sequentially beginning with "1" and ending with "21". Although there were no volumes numbered "5", "12" or "14", two volumes were each labeled "10" and two separately submitted volumes were labeled "1". As found below, when these volumes are substituted for volumes "5", "12" and "14", there are 21 volumes as indicated on the cover sheet. Moreover, since 5,000 signatures are required and respondent's petition contained over 18,000 signatures, elimination of these volumes, which contained only some 5,000 signatures, still would leave more than 13,000 valid signatures.

Accordingly, respondent's petition was properly validated.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Franco v. Velez, Cremonese

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 967 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Franco v. Velez, Cremonese

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUBEN FRANCO, Respondent, v. ORLANDO VELEZ et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 28, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 967 (N.Y. 1985)
493 N.Y.S.2d 1022
483 N.E.2d 1154

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Bd. of Elections in N.Y.

In so noting, the court is mindful of the basic policy considerations which disfavor the disenfranchisement…

People v. Maxam

Defendant next claims that she should not have been convicted because the signatures were genuine and not…