From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fortunato v. Fortunato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1997
242 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 29, 1997

Appeal from Family Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court did not err in finding that the parties' 20-year-old son was emancipated as of September 1994. Although a parent of a minor child has a continuing obligation to support the child until the age of 21 ( see, Family Ct Act § 413), emancipation of the child suspends the parent's support obligation ( see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Jones] v. Jones-Gamble, 227 A.D.2d 618; Matter of Alice C. v. Bernard G. C., 193 A.D.2d 97, 106). Children of employable age are emancipated if they become economically independent of their parents through employment, and are self-supporting ( see, Matter of Alice C. v. Bernard G. C., supra; see also, Matter of Roe v. Doe, 29 N.Y.2d 188). Here, the record reveals that the parties' son began working an average of 30 to 36 hours per week in August 1994, that he used his earnings to meet all of his personal expenses, including car insurance payments and telephone charges, and that he voluntarily contributed modest sums to his mother for room and board. Moreover, the son was not attending school, and had no plans to save money for tuition or return to college in the immediate future. Under these circumstances, we decline to disturb the court's finding that the son was emancipated.

Furthermore, there is no merit to the mother's claim that newly-discovered evidence of the father's 1996 income warranted a new calculation of the father's support obligation for the parties' daughter upon a theory of either reargument or renewal. In this regard, we note that the father's 1996 W-2 statement, which did not exist at the time of the April 1996 hearing, was not newly-discovered evidence ( see, Matter of Brooklyn Welding Corp. v. Chin, 236 A.D.2d 392; Chiarella v. Quitoni, 178 A.D.2d 602), and that the Family Court's June 1996 support award was properly based upon the father's 1994 income ( see, Family Ct Act § 413 [b] [6] [i]).

Thompson, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Fortunato v. Fortunato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1997
242 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Fortunato v. Fortunato

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DENISE FORTUNATO, Appellant, v. JOHN FORTUNATO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 720 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

Monti v. DiBedendetto

The Support Magistrate properly determined that the child was no longer emancipated. "It is fundamental…

In re Lowe

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Although a parent of a minor child has a continuing…