From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Flower v. D'Apice

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 7, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 715 (N.Y. 1984)

Summary

designating petition invalidated where candidate conceded that an individual identified on his designating petition did not sign the petition, and that the candidate knew of this irregularlity

Summary of this case from Felder v. Storobin

Opinion

Argued September 7, 1984

Decided September 7, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Lawrence Martin, J.

Edward T. McCormack for appellant.

Guy T. Parisi for Robert E. Flower and another, respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs, and this court's stay vacated, in the following memorandum: We conclude that the factual determinations made by the Appellate Division more nearly comport with the weight of the evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE. Taking no part: Judge WACHTLER.


Summaries of

Matter of Flower v. D'Apice

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 7, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 715 (N.Y. 1984)

designating petition invalidated where candidate conceded that an individual identified on his designating petition did not sign the petition, and that the candidate knew of this irregularlity

Summary of this case from Felder v. Storobin
Case details for

Matter of Flower v. D'Apice

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT E. FLOWER et al., Respondents, v. ANTONIA D'APICE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 7, 1984

Citations

63 N.Y.2d 715 (N.Y. 1984)
479 N.Y.S.2d 982
468 N.E.2d 1119

Citing Cases

Felder v. Storobin

Here, based upon the admissions of David Storobin and the record of the evidentiary hearing held in…

Williams v. Barry

As a general rule, a candidate's designating petition will be invalidated on the ground that some signatures…