From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Felsen v. Scaringe

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 932 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1981

Decided October 21, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, RAYMOND E. MARINELLI, J.

Thomas J. Spargo for appellants.

Paul M. Whitaker for petitioner-respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition to invalidate the nominating petition should be denied.

Respondents' nominating petition included the names of three persons for appointment to a committee to fill vacancies, as is required by law (Election Law, § 6-140, subd 1). Two of the named appointees, however, did not register as voters in the Town of Guilderland, the pertinent political unit, until, respectively, one day and one week after the first day that petitions could be circulated. Having registered in time for the election, they nonetheless qualified as "registered voters within such political unit" for the purposes of the statute (see Matter of Naples v Carr, 29 Misc.2d 944, affd 14 A.D.2d 828, affd 10 N.Y.2d 850 [applying former section 138 of the Election Law, the predecessor to section 6-140]). In any event, on oral argument it was undisputed that no signatures were actually collected before the appointees registered to vote, and the statute certainly imposes no requirement that registration occur before then.

The objection that the petition does not clearly delineate the offices is without merit. The defect alleged describes at worst only a deviation from form, but not from the statutorily prescribed substance (see Election Law, § 6-140). As such, substantial compliance with the statute is sufficient (cf. Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 N.Y.2d 772; Matter of Ryan v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 53 N.Y.2d 515; Matter of Alamo v Black, 51 N.Y.2d 716). As all the information necessary to identify clearly the offices involved is included on the face of the petition, such requirement has been met.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Felsen v. Scaringe

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 932 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Felsen v. Scaringe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KARL E. FELSEN, Respondent, v. GEORGE P. SCARINGE et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 21, 1981

Citations

54 N.Y.2d 932 (N.Y. 1981)

Citing Cases

Romeo v. Lewis

The learned judge in Morgia does not state where he derived the authority to override a judgment of the…

Jones v. De Santis

Here, while the specifications of objections identified the total number of valid signatures, rather than the…