From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Falcon v. Accardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 28, 1993

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly directed respondent to pay the mother's expenses in connection with her confinement and recovery during the birth of the child (see, Family Ct Act § 514, 545). Because the mother received public assistance from the time the child was born until the time of the proceeding, imposing full costs of the mother's confinement upon respondent was within the court's sound discretion (see, Matter of Cortland County Dept. of Social Servs. v Thomas ZZ., 141 A.D.2d 119, 123; Matter of Lisa M. UU. v Mario D. VV., 78 A.D.2d 711). Contrary to respondent's contention, his liability to pay the mother's confinement expenses does not depend upon his ability to pay at the time of the birth (see, Family Ct Act § 514, 545; Matter of Steuben County Dept. of Social Servs. v Deats, 76 N.Y.2d 451).

We reject respondent's contention that he was denied due process. The record establishes that the Hearing Examiner advised respondent of his right to counsel; however, respondent elected to proceed on his own (see, Family Ct Act § 433; Linder v Linder, 122 A.D.2d 27; Matter of Dickstein v Dickstein, 99 A.D.2d 929). Respondent was not denied equal protection on the ground that Family Court Act § 514 imposes liability upon fathers but not mothers for confinement costs (see, Matter of Lisa M. UU. v Mario D. VV., supra; see also, Family Ct Act § 545).

Respondent's support obligation was properly set at 17% of his income, based upon his hourly wage of $8.75 (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [b] [3] [i]).

The issue of respondent's liability for the mother's confinement costs was not previously litigated in the paternity proceeding. Therefore, the Department of Social Services is not barred by principles of res judicata from seeking reimbursement for those costs in the present proceeding (see generally, Matter of Hodes v Axelrod, 70 N.Y.2d 364, 372-373).


Summaries of

Matter of Falcon v. Accardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Falcon v. Accardi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BONNIE FALCON, Respondent, v. STEPHEN ACCARDI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 28, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 406

Citing Cases

North v. Murtaugh

The precise issue whether plaintiff's driveway encroached onto defendants' property was never determined in…

Aikens v. Nell

We reject the further contentions of respondent that he was denied both the right to counsel and to the…