Opinion
May 21, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the record does not support the petitioner's claim that the correctional authorities have been deliberately indifferent to his medical needs (see, Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104; Matter of De Flumer v. Dalsheim, 122 A.D.2d 872, 873; Matter of Ronson v Commissioner of Correction, 112 A.D.2d 488, 489). Nor is there anything in the record which suggests that the court should substitute its judgment for that of the treating physicians (see, Matter of De Flumer v. Dalsheim, supra). Accordingly, the petition was properly denied. Kooper, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.