Opinion
April 14, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.).
Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There was substantial compliance with Suffolk County Civil Service rule XIII (6) (see, Reilly v. Shaw, 81 A.D.2d 610). The determination under review was not arbitrary or capricious (see, Matter of Talamo v. Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 637, 639), and the petitioner, as a probationary employee, had no right to a hearing (Matter of Bonney v. Dilworth, 99 A.D.2d 468). We have examined the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.