From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Enright v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1947
74 N.E.2d 170 (N.Y. 1947)

Opinion

Argued April 17, 1947

Decided May 22, 1947

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Charles B. Sullivan and John J. Connors, Jr., for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Roy Weidersum and Theodore M. Schwartz of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ. LEWIS, J., dissents and votes for reversal and dismissal of the claim. DYE, J., dissents and votes for remission for the recomputation of the award.


Summaries of

Matter of Enright v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1947
74 N.E.2d 170 (N.Y. 1947)
Case details for

Matter of Enright v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BERNARD ENRIGHT, Respondent, against…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 22, 1947

Citations

74 N.E.2d 170 (N.Y. 1947)
74 N.E.2d 170

Citing Cases

Claim of Vance v. Hut Neckwear Co.

( Gleason v. Amsdell, 9 Daly 393; Restatement, Agency, § 255; 57 C. J. S., Master and Servant, § 564, p. 280;…

Claim of Valverde v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development

It is well established that the issue of whether an employer-employee relationship exists is a factual matter…