From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yashio Enomoto v. Toia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1980
407 N.E.2d 1346 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued April 24, 1980

Decided May 29, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, JOSEPH S. MATTINA, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Alan W. Rubenstein and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for appellants.

Bernard B. Freedman and Rose H. Sconiers for petitioners-respondents.



MEMORANDUM.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court ( 67 A.D.2d 1085).

The regulation of the State Department of Social Services as amended March 9, 1979 (18 N.Y.CRR 349.3) is not applicable to either of the present cases. Accordingly, we have not considered what effect it might have on fact situations similar to those in the cases now before us.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Yashio Enomoto v. Toia

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1980
407 N.E.2d 1346 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Yashio Enomoto v. Toia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of YASHIO ENOMOTO et al., Respondents, v. PHILIP TOIA, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1980

Citations

407 N.E.2d 1346 (N.Y. 1980)
407 N.E.2d 1346
430 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

Minino v. Perales

Thus, the sponsor income deeming amendment to the Federal AFDC statute does not require this Court to uphold…

Matter of Rickey v. Perales

We will not ignore the plain meaning of section 366 (subd 2, par [a], cl [8]) of the Social Services Law and…