From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Edmonds v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 1997
239 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 22, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.).


Petitioner, a prison inmate, brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge an administrative determination finding him guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules, as alleged in four January 25, 1995 misbehavior reports. Finding that the administrative hearing was not conducted in a timely fashion because respondent's designee did not authorize an extension pursuant to 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 until one day following the expiration of the 14-day period for completion of the hearing, Supreme Court granted the petition, vacated the administrative determination and ordered expungement of all records relating to the charges against petitioner. Respondent appeals, and we reverse.

As we have held on several prior occasions, "in the absence of any substantive prejudice resulting from the minimum delay there is no reason to expunge" (Matter of Lugo v. Coughlin, 182 A.D.2d 920, 921; see, Matter of Reynoso v. Coombe, 229 A.D.2d 732, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 801; Matter of Joyce v. Coughlin, 219 A.D.2d 777, 778). Not only has there been no showing of prejudice, but the record establishes that the delay was occasioned by the Hearing Officer's effort to secure the testimony of a witness requested by petitioner (see, Matter of Joyce v. Coughlin, supra, at 778).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, determination confirmed and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Edmonds v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 1997
239 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Edmonds v. Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS EDMONDS, Respondent, v. PHILIP COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 22, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 1023

Citing Cases

Winfield v. Carpenter

We confirm. Petitioner contends that the tier II disciplinary determination is unsupported by substantial…

Matter of Torres v. Goord

Thereafter, a second extension was granted authorizing the disciplinary hearing to commence on March 17,…