From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dolce v. Regional Transit Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 3, 1980
77 A.D.2d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

July 3, 1980


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed May 24, 1979, as amended by decision filed September 25, 1979. The record establishes beyond any dispute that the claimant was discharged because of lost time due to an employment related accident. Such a dismissal explicitly violates section 120 of the Workers' Compensation Law, which states, in pertinent part: "It shall be unlawful for any employer * * * to discharge or in any manner discriminate against an employee as to his employment because such employee has claimed or attempted to claim compensation from such employer". The employer's assertion before the board that proof as to its policy of discharging any employee because of excessive absenteeism should be permitted was properly rejected by the board as irrelevant to the treatment of this employee. In this case the discharge was solely because of the work-related accident and the underlying policy as to absenteeism expressly included such incidents. The employer has failed to establish any error of law on the part of the board and the decision appealed from is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board against the employer. Greenblott, J.P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Dolce v. Regional Transit Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 3, 1980
77 A.D.2d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Dolce v. Regional Transit Service

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRANK J. LO DOLCE, Respondent, v. REGIONAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1980

Citations

77 A.D.2d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Kern v. South Baltimore Gen. Hosp

The statute did not contain the word "solely." Similarly, in Lo Dolce v. Regional Transit Serv., Inc., 77…

Yockey v. State

II. Yockey attempts on appeal to rescue her cause on what has to be described as a decidedly different…