From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Doig

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 10, 1993
631 A.2d 542 (N.J. 1993)

Opinion

September 10, 1993.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that JO DOIG of WEST WINDSOR, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(b) by undertaking a dual representation of two individuals in a business/real estate matter without obtaining their consent after full disclosure, and RPC 8.4(c) by altering a deed after closing, failing to inform the co-owner and the bank of her action, and misrepresenting the reason for the inclusion of the additional name on the deed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and JO DOIG is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Doig

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 10, 1993
631 A.2d 542 (N.J. 1993)
Case details for

In re Doig

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JO DOIG, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 10, 1993

Citations

631 A.2d 542 (N.J. 1993)
631 A.2d 542

Citing Cases

Matter of Guidone

"We have generally found that in cases involving a conflict of interest, absent egregious circumstances or…

Matter of Berkowitz

See, e.g., In re Porro, 134 N.J. 524, 635 A.2d 506 (1993); In re Doig, 134 N.J. 118, 631 A.2d 542 (1993); In…