From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doherty's New Dorp Tavern v. New York State Liquor Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1982
434 N.E.2d 709 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided February 23, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Robert Conciatori and Warren B. Pesetsky for appellants.

Paul A. Lemole and Peter J. Napolitano for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 82 A.D.2d 858). The finding of the State Liquor Authority that the bouncer overreacted in forcibly ejecting a patron from the licensed premises, without more, is insufficient to sustain the charge. (See Matter of L.B.R. Enterprises v New York State Liq. Auth., 53 N.Y.2d 714).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Doherty's New Dorp Tavern v. New York State Liquor Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1982
434 N.E.2d 709 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Doherty's New Dorp Tavern v. New York State Liquor Authority

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOHERTY'S NEW DORP TAVERN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 23, 1982

Citations

434 N.E.2d 709 (N.Y. 1982)
434 N.E.2d 709
449 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

Matter of Pappy Jack's Pub, Inc. v. Duffy

This proceeding by petitioner ensued. Upon a review of the record, we find that the determination was…

Irvington Enterprises, Inc. v. Duffy

The challenge to the applicability of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6) must also be rejected. While a…