From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dingman v. General Fibre Box Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 29, 1970
35 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

September 29, 1970


Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an alleged decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed November 13, 1969. On April 24, 1969 the Workmen's Compensation Board filed its decision herein reversing a prior decision of the Referee and finding that claimant's disability began within four weeks of termination of employment and that claimant was entitled to disability benefits. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 203.) On November 13, 1969 the Referee made a disability benefit award in accordance with the board's decision. On November 21, 1969 a notice of appeal from the Referee's award was filed. A direct appeal from a Referee's award of benefits is specifically proscribed by section 23 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law and, accordingly, it must be dismissed. ( Matter of Zambrona v. Renell Bake Shop, 34 A.D.2d 707; Matter of Shadorsky v. Longwood Parlor Furniture Corp., 33 A.D.2d 932.) Appeal from Referee's decision dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Dingman v. General Fibre Box Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 29, 1970
35 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Matter of Dingman v. General Fibre Box Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DARCY D. DINGMAN, Respondent, v. GENERAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Richards v. Allied Universal Sec.

Claimant's notice of appeal from the May 2020 Board decision references an incorrect date of filing but, in…

Richards v. Allied Universal Sec.

Claimant's notice of appeal from the May 2020 Board decision references an incorrect date of filing but, in…