From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of DiChiara v. Chesworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1988
139 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

April 18, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The return amply supports the finding of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, that the petitioner had attempted to serve the notice of petition and petition by ordinary mail, without authority to proceed other than by personal service. Thus, the petitioner failed to obtain personal jurisdiction over the respondent and the court properly dismissed the proceeding. Mangano, J.P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of DiChiara v. Chesworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1988
139 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of DiChiara v. Chesworth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK DiCHIARA, Appellant, v. DONALD O. CHESWORTH, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1988

Citations

139 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Campisi v. Scelba

In the instant case, the respondent was personally served with an undated petition on or about June 28, 1990.…

Sughe Jo v. May Department Stores Co.

It appears that Sughe Jo mailed the petition and related documents to Arnot Ogden; those documents were never…