Opinion
May 22, 1990
Petitioner has failed to establish that respondents are acting without the scope of their jurisdiction or authorized powers, and petitioner's claims, including alleged violations of section 73 Civ. Rights of the Civil Rights Law, can be reviewed and redressed through the ordinary channels of appeal. Accordingly, the extraordinary remedy of prohibition pursuant to CPLR article 78 does not lie. (Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352-354.)
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.