From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Delores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Seneca County, Bender, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Wesley, Doerr, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, petition reinstated and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the petition. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in dismissing the petition, seeking review of an order of retention, as untimely. The time within which to commence a review proceeding begins to run on the date that the allegedly ill person is served with the order of retention (see, Matter of Coates, 9 N.Y.2d 242, 252, appeal dismissed sub nom. Coates v Walters, 368 U.S. 34). Petitioner was served with that order on May 27, 1994; thus, her petition, filed on June 17, 1994, is timely (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35). Although the order of retention has expired, we decline to treat the issue as moot. Because orders of retention are of short duration, it is likely that this issue would otherwise evade appellate review (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714-715).


Summaries of

Matter of Delores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Delores

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DELORES I., Appellant. ANTHONY N. MUSTILLE, as Executive…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 611

Citing Cases

Matter of Barber v. Rochester Ctr.

Petitioner contends that the court erred in determining that petitioner suffers from a "dangerous mental…

In Matter of the Retention of J.R.

Here, as in the Crumpley case, the retention order had expired and a hearing had yet to be held with respect…