From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C. De Masco Scrap Iron & Metal Corp. v. Zirk

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 6, 1979
387 N.E.2d 227 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Submitted January 3, 1979

Decided February 6, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GORDON M. LIPETZ, J.

Joseph F. Klein, Town Attorney (Raymond F. Wolfram of counsel), for appellants.

Sidney N. Gitelman for Harold Ziegner and others, respondents.

Edgar Hills for C. De Masco Scrap Iron Metal Corp., respondent in the first above-entitled proceeding, and intervenor-respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.


In Matter of De Masco Scrap Iron Metal Corp. v Zirk: Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice JOSEPH F. HAWKINS at the Appellate Division ( 62 A.D.2d 92).

In Matter of Allmendinger v Ziegner: Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 62 A.D.2d 1053).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG.


Summaries of

C. De Masco Scrap Iron & Metal Corp. v. Zirk

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 6, 1979
387 N.E.2d 227 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

C. De Masco Scrap Iron & Metal Corp. v. Zirk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of C. DE MASCO SCRAP IRON METAL CORP., Respondent, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 6, 1979

Citations

387 N.E.2d 227 (N.Y. 1979)
387 N.E.2d 227
414 N.Y.S.2d 516

Citing Cases

Gershowitz v. Planning Bd.

Per Curiam. The prime issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the operation of an automobile shredder…

Town of Huntington v. Barracuda Transp. Co.

The trucks (tractor trailers) are all refrigerated and almost all are owned by the defendants. There is no…