From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of DE LA ROSA v. GOORD [3d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1999
688 N.Y.S.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 15, 1999

Raymond De La Rosa, Elmira, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: MIKOLL, J.P., CREW III, YESAWICH JR., PETERS and CARPINELLO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from possessing unauthorized organizational material. The charge was based upon letters, written by petitioner's son, discussing petitioner's participation in the Latin Kings (a Hispanic gang) and a picture of a lion with gold crown stickers affixed to the corner which were discovered during a search of petitioner's cell. While petitioner denied being affiliated with the Latin Kings, his son's letters specifically noted petitioner's membership in the gang.

This evidence, together with the inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination that the material was gang related (see, e.g., Matter of Rivera v. Coombe, 231 A.D.2d 790, 791; see generally, Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 887). Petitioner's explanation for possessing the materials presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see,Matter of Devodier v. Selsky, 241 A.D.2d 737).

Furthermore, having failed to raise the issue at the hearing or on administrative appeal, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer allegedly consulted with someone off the record before making the determination is not preserved for our review (see, Matter of Murphy v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 724, 725). In any event, were we to consider this issue, we would find no record support for petitioner's conclusory allegation.

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of DE LA ROSA v. GOORD [3d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1999
688 N.Y.S.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of DE LA ROSA v. GOORD [3d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND DE LA ROSA, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1999

Citations

688 N.Y.S.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Goord

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule…

Matter of Vaughn v. Selsky

Therefore, the request was immaterial to petitioner's defense that the razor blade was planted by another…