From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 5, 1993
189 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 5, 1993

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.).


The Family Court properly dismissed the juvenile delinquency petition (Matter of Randy K., 77 N.Y.2d 398). The unavailability of a complaining witness due to an out-of-State vacation does not constitute "special circumstances" for an adjournment (Matter of Juan V., 160 A.D.2d 303; Matter of Steven C., 129 Misc.2d 946). The presentment agency failed to act diligently in securing the presence of the witness prior to his departure (Matter of Vincent M., 125 A.D.2d 60, affd 70 N.Y.2d 793; Matter of Snap, 125 Misc.2d 314). Accordingly, while the limited incursion into the "special circumstances" period was limited, "special circumstances" were not established (compare, Matter of Nakia L., 179 A.D.2d 145, lv granted 80 N.Y.2d 758).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 5, 1993
189 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of David

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 5, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
592 N.Y.S.2d 25

Citing Cases

Matter of Jay R

In such circumstances, where all the evidence relating to credibility is before it, a suppression court's…