From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Daubner v. Dinkins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 21, 1973
303 N.E.2d 73 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued September 21, 1973

Decided September 21, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ABRAHAM J. GELLINOFF, J.

Victor Kovner and Seymour Schwartz, pro se, for Seymour Schwartz, appellant.

Harold M. Hershman, Edward Honig and Irving S.K. Chin, pro se, for Irving S.K. Chin, appellant.

Louis Okin, respondent, pro se.


Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In our view, since the irregularities were, to quote from Matter of Ippolito v. Power ( 22 N.Y.2d 594, 597-598), "sufficiently large in number to establish the probability that the result would be changed by * * * invalidation" of the votes, the order directing a new primary election should be affirmed (see, also, Matter of Mack v. Cocuzzo, 22 N.Y.2d 901; Matter of Nodar v. Power, 18 N.Y.2d 697).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Taking no part: Judge BREITEL.


Summaries of

Matter of Daubner v. Dinkins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 21, 1973
303 N.E.2d 73 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

Matter of Daubner v. Dinkins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS B. DAUBNER, Petitioner, and LOUIS OKIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 21, 1973

Citations

303 N.E.2d 73 (N.Y. 1973)
303 N.E.2d 73
348 N.Y.S.2d 556

Citing Cases

Matter of Silver v. Feuer, Friedlander

It is not necessary, therefore, to reach the issue considered by the dissenter at the Appellate Division,…

Matter of Silver v. Feuer

(Cf. Matter of Lowenstein v. Larkin, 40 A.D.2d 604, affd. on opn. of App. Div. 31 N.Y.2d 654.) If there is to…