From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Daniel S. v. Dowling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

In Daniel S. v. Dowling, 684 N.Y.S. 2d 99 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998), appeal dismissed by 93 N.Y.2d 919 (N.Y. 1999), the New York Appellate Division held that the "failure to provide a fair hearing to the child named in an unfounded report does not constitute a denial of procedural due process."

Summary of this case from Doe v. Darien Bd. of Educ.

Opinion

December 31, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Genesee County, Graney, J. — CPLR art 78.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in directing respondent to provide petitioner with a hearing to review the determination of the Genesee County Department of Social Services that a report of possible child abuse or maltreatment of petitioner by his father was unfounded ( see, Social Services Law § 424; 18 NYCRR 432.2 [b] [3] [iv]). Under Social Services Law § 422 (8) (a) (i), only the subject of an indicated report has the right to seek review at a fair hearing ( see, 18 NYCRR 434.5). Petitioner, the child reported to the State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, lacks standing to challenge the determination that the report was unfounded ( see, Matter of Diane P., 110 A.D.2d 354, 355, appeal dismissed 67 N.Y.2d 918; Delehanty v. Delaware County Dept. of Social Servs., 166 Misc.2d 182, 185-186; see also, Getman v. Dowling, 162 Misc.2d 345, 347).

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the Legislature's failure to provide a fair hearing to the child named in an unfounded report does not constitute a denial of procedural due process. "The requirements of procedural due process apply only to the deprivation of interests encompassed by the 14th Amendment's protection of liberty and property" ( Matter of Twin Town Little League v. Town of Poestenkill, 249 A.D.2d 811, 812, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 805; see, Matter of Mary L. v. State of N.Y. Dept. of Social Servs., 244 A.D.2d 133, 136). Petitioner was deprived of no constitutionally protected interest as the result of the determination that the report of possible child abuse or maltreatment by his father was unfounded.

Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Hayes, Callahan and Balio, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Daniel S. v. Dowling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

In Daniel S. v. Dowling, 684 N.Y.S. 2d 99 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998), appeal dismissed by 93 N.Y.2d 919 (N.Y. 1999), the New York Appellate Division held that the "failure to provide a fair hearing to the child named in an unfounded report does not constitute a denial of procedural due process."

Summary of this case from Doe v. Darien Bd. of Educ.
Case details for

Matter of Daniel S. v. Dowling

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANIEL S., Respondent, v. MICHAEL J. DOWLING, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
684 N.Y.S.2d 99

Citing Cases

Doe v. Darien Bd. of Educ.

At least one state court has held that a child does not have standing to challenge the decision by a state…