From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Daly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1898
26 App. Div. 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

February Term, 1898.

A.J. Adams, for the appellant.

H.T. Dykman, for the respondent, petitioner.


The land taken from the appellant in this proceeding is a lot about 126 feet wide and 200 feet deep on Moger avenue, in the village of Mount Kisco, in the county of Westchester. The only building upon the premises was a barn. The amount awarded by the commissioners for the entire property, comprising the land and this building, was $2,669.29.

The only ground on which this award is attacked is its alleged inadequacy. It appears to be $367.36 less than the highest valuation given by the witnesses called in behalf of the city of New York, and $72 less than the lowest valuation given by such witnesses. We do not think that the difference in either case is sufficient to justify us in setting aside the report of the commissioners. The rule is too well settled to require the citation of authority to support it, that these officers have the right to be influenced, in the appraisal which they make, by their own inspection and examination of the property to be taken; and there is nothing to show that the result reached in this case was not due to a proper exercise of their functions in this respect.

Our attention is also called to the award made by the same commissioners for parcel No. 27 at Mount Kisco, which is said to be property near this, where the award was four times the amount which they allowed per front foot for the parcel in controversy here. Such proof as the record contains, however, as to the comparative character of the two pieces of land, indicates that the higher valuation placed upon parcel No. 27 was warranted by the presence thereon of a railroad switch and by the somewhat superior situation of the lot; so that it is impossible for us to assert that the difference shows the present award to be inadequate.

The order appealed from must be affirmed.

All concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Matter of Daly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1898
26 App. Div. 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

Matter of Daly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application and Petition of MICHAEL T. DALY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1898

Citations

26 App. Div. 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
49 N.Y.S. 795

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. City of New York v. Stillings

rne in mind that the right of the respondent to damages for the change of grade rests entirely upon the act…

Matter of City of New York

01, chap. 466], § 988, as amd. by Laws of 1906, chap. 658; Matter of Mayor [ Trinity Ave.], 81 App. Div.…