From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Curtis v. Cross Bay Excavating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 12, 1978
65 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Summary

In Curtis v. Cross Bay Excavating Co., 65 A.D.2d 638, 409 N.Y.S.2d 279 (1978), an intoxicated employee died in an accident.

Summary of this case from Poole v. Earp Meat Co.

Opinion

October 12, 1978


Appeals from decisions of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed June 12, 1975, May 6, 1977, and November 29, 1977. The board found "upon the review of the entire record, the Board Panel finds based upon the credible evidence of the widow and the testimony of the doctors that the death was not solely caused by intoxication. The Panel finds that decedent's accident at home which resulted in death was caused by instability of the injured right leg and was a direct consequence of the accident sustained on October 7, 1972." The record contains substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Curtis v. Cross Bay Excavating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 12, 1978
65 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

In Curtis v. Cross Bay Excavating Co., 65 A.D.2d 638, 409 N.Y.S.2d 279 (1978), an intoxicated employee died in an accident.

Summary of this case from Poole v. Earp Meat Co.
Case details for

Matter of Curtis v. Cross Bay Excavating Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KATHERINE CURTIS, Respondent, v. CROSS BAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Poole v. Earp Meat Co.

Schmidt indicates the evidence concerning the pain and exhaustion experienced by Poole from a previous injury…

Matter of Pellerin v. N.Y. State Department

The determination of whether a claimant's act is unreasonable and therefore an intervening one is itself a…