From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crandell M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1999
266 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted October 14, 1999

December 2, 1999

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Porzio, J.), dated December 17, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated November 10, 1997, made upon the appellant's admission that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated November 10, 1997.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo and Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent.

MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's challenge to his placement with the Division for Youth has been rendered academic by the fact that he has already completed the placement (see, Matter of Tricia L., 253 A.D.2d 882 ; Matter of Carlos S., 243 A.D.2d 569 ; Matter of Ricardo R., 220 A.D.2d 431 ; Matter of Greg W., 213 A.D.2d 414 .

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., H. MILLER, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Crandell M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1999
266 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Crandell M

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CRANDELL M. (Anonymous), appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 558

Citing Cases

Matter of William U

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the Family Court's…

In the Matter of Raymond G

The appellant was not entitled to a missing-witness charge ( see, Matter of Paul N., 244 A.D.2d 488; cf.,…