From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Coyle v. Rozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1993
199 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 20, 1993


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland, 282 N.Y. 256; Matter of Keogh v Dolce, 84 A.D.2d 579). Furthermore, the penalty of termination of the petitioner's employment was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222). This is especially true in view of the fact that police departments are quasi-military organizations requiring strict discipline (see, Matter of Bal v Murphy, 55 A.D.2d 26, affd 43 N.Y.2d 762). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Coyle v. Rozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1993
199 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Coyle v. Rozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TIMOTHY T. COYLE, Petitioner, v. SAMUEL J. ROZZI et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 91

Citing Cases

Longton v. Corinth

The penalty will not be disturbed unless it is "so disproportionate as to be shocking to one's sense of…

Dilauria v. Police Commrs. Town of Harrison

Thus, the finding that the petitioner disobeyed two lawful orders given to him by Chief Hall is supported by…