From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
68 N.E.2d 872 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 1946

Decided July 23, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Robert E. Whalen, Charles E. Nichols and Sherman A. Murphy, Jr. for appellant.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Roy Weidersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

John M. Cullen for Special Fund for Reopened Cases, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. FULD, J., dissents on the ground that the voluntary and gratuitous payment of drug or medical bills is not "payment * * * of compensation previously awarded" within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
68 N.E.2d 872 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LUTHER E. COOK, Respondent, against NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 1946

Citations

68 N.E.2d 872 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 872

Citing Cases

Matter of Pollock v. Melville Shoe Corporation

The prior decisions of the board that deceased had completely recovered from his original injury, were not…

MATTER OF LOPA v. BRILLO MANUFACTURING CO., INC

The liability cast upon the fund by the statute (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 25-a), does not accrue until…