From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Conklin v. Canary

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 952 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued August 26, 1985

Decided August 28, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Melvyn Tanenbaum, J.

Herbert A. Smith, Jr., for appellant.

E. Thomas Boyle for respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (112 A.D.2d ___).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.


Summaries of

Matter of Conklin v. Canary

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 952 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Conklin v. Canary

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANCES A. CONKLIN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. CANARY et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 28, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 952 (N.Y. 1985)
494 N.Y.S.2d 106
484 N.E.2d 135

Citing Cases

Paladino v. Kyriakides

Following oral arguments, counsel for respondent John Kyriakides requested leave to submit answering papers…

Maher v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections

idate of ... such party ..., otherwise such designation or nomination shall be null and void” (Election Law §…