From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cohen v. Tesoriero Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1992
179 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 27, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the petitioner the principal amount of $2,500 and substituting therefor a provision awarding the petitioner the principal amount of $7,500; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs payable to the petitioner.

The petitioner, an attorney discharged by his client prior to the termination of a lawsuit, failed to establish his entitlement to compensation on a contingent fee basis (cf., Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 N.Y.2d 454). However, based on our independent review of the record, we conclude that the amount of counsel fees awarded to the petitioner on a quantum meruit basis of actual work performed was inadequate. We have therefore modified the award to the extent indicated (see, Jordan v Freeman, 40 A.D.2d 656). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cohen v. Tesoriero Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1992
179 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Cohen v. Tesoriero Bell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAX COHEN, Appellant, v. GRAINGER, TESORIERO BELL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
578 N.Y.S.2d 665

Citing Cases

Matter of Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero Bell

Decided February 23, 1993 Appeal from (2d Dept: 179 A.D.2d 808) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Kerns, Inc. v. the Wella Corporation

New York courts often refer to dictionaries, and specifically to Webster's Third New International…