Opinion
December 7, 2000.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 24, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Allan S. Gordon, Elmira, appellant in person.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Carmen R. Torrent of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Claimant was discharged from his employment as a warehouse supervisor after he refused to submit to a random drug test required by his employer. The record establishes that claimant received an employee handbook outlining the employer's policy regarding random drug testing which noted that refusal to submit to the random drug test would be considered insubordination and result in termination. Inasmuch as claimant was aware of and signed an acknowledgment that he understood the terms and conditions of his employment, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant's refusal to submit to the drug test constituted disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Flaherty [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 647; Matter of Grover [Waste-Stream Inc. — Sweeney], 233 A.D.2d 809). Although claimant contends that he was not randomly selected for the drug test, a contention that the employer disputes, this created a credibility issue for resolution by the Board (see, Matter of Derian [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 722, 723).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.