From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City Service Cleaning Contrs. v. Vanzo

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Dec 28, 1942
179 Misc. 368 (N.Y. Misc. 1942)

Opinion

December 28, 1942.

Irving E. Epstein for petitioner.

Sheehan Harold for respondent.


Motion for an order directing an arbitration of alleged disputes and staying the respondent from proceeding with his action in the Municipal Court of the City of New York is denied. The action in the Municipal Court has been brought under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U.S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), and cannot be restrained by reason of a contract compelling arbitration. Arbitration is a remedial right, while the right of suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act is a substantive right. ( Voutrey v. General Baking Co., 39 F. Supp. 974; Matter of Berkovitz v. Arbib Houlberg, Inc., 230 N.Y. 261.)


Summaries of

Matter of City Service Cleaning Contrs. v. Vanzo

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Dec 28, 1942
179 Misc. 368 (N.Y. Misc. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of City Service Cleaning Contrs. v. Vanzo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CITY SERVICE CLEANING CONTRACTORS, INC., Petitioner…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Dec 28, 1942

Citations

179 Misc. 368 (N.Y. Misc. 1942)
39 N.Y.S.2d 24

Citing Cases

Andacht v. William Andacht, Inc.

" Our courts have held otherwise ( Garrity v. Bagold Corp., 180 Misc. 120, mod. 267 App. Div. 353; Matter of…