From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1916
113 N.E. 1050 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 24, 1916

Decided June 16, 1916

George Lawyer, Charles Harwood and Henry T. Randall for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Joel J. Squier and John J. Kearney of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, without prejudice to the petitioner's remedy by action against the city or against Caroline Wedinger; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1916
113 N.E. 1050 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 16, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1050 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1050

Citing Cases

Merriman v. City of New York

The order of the Special Term was affirmed at the Appellate Division ( Matter of City of New York, 172 App.…

Matter of Incorporated Village of Roslyn

The right of appellants to this award was absolute under the findings of the court as to consequential…