From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Christopher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Killeen, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him a person in need of supervision and placing him on probation for 12 months. He also appeals from an order directing his placement outside the home based upon a violation of that probation. The admissions to the PINS petition and to the petition alleging a violation of probation were made by the Law Guardian and not the respondent, and the court failed on both occasions to advise respondent of possible dispositional orders or ascertain whether he voluntarily waived his right to fact-finding hearings. This constituted reversible error as to each purported admission (see, Matter of Mark S., 144 A.D.2d 1010; Matter of Melissa P., 140 A.D.2d 1006). Moreover, the court erred in removing respondent from the courtroom after the Law Guardian entered an admission to the violation of probation. The record fails to demonstrate any basis for such exclusion (see, Matter of Cecilia R., 36 N.Y.2d 317, 322-323).


Summaries of

Matter of Christopher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Christopher

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER W. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 165

Citing Cases

Investigation No. 04-730

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, on the other hand, has taken the opposite view, and has held that…

In the Matter of Investigation No. 04-730

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, on the other hand, has taken the opposite view, and has held that…