From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chmielewski v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1984
463 N.E.2d 1229 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided March 29, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Martin Evans, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Miriam Skolnick of counsel), for City of New York, appellant.

Lewis I. Wolf for Metropolitan Transportation Authority, appellant.

Stephen A. Weingrad for Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, appellant.

William Greenberg for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting petitioner's application to serve late notices of claim.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Chmielewski v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1984
463 N.E.2d 1229 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Chmielewski v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BOLESLAW CHMIELEWSKI, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 29, 1984

Citations

463 N.E.2d 1229 (N.Y. 1984)
463 N.E.2d 1229
475 N.Y.S.2d 377

Citing Cases

Matter of Gruber v. City of New York

We affirm. Whether to grant the relief requested by the petitioner is a question committed to the sound…

Matter of Delzotto v. County of Warren

We reverse. This court is vested with broad discretion in considering whether service of a late notice of…