From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chiaverini v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

December, 1932.


Order granting peremptory mandamus order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied. The relator failed to show that he had been appointed in compliance with the requirements of the municipal civil service commission's rules; on the contrary, it affirmatively appears by the answering affidavit that there had been no such compliance on his part. Hence, he never had been legally appointed ( Matter of Meehan v. Flaherty, 119 App. Div. 128; People v. Ingham, 107 id. 41), and even though the petitioner had served in the position to which he seeks reinstatement, that fact did not cure an illegal appointment. ( People ex rel. Lee v. Gleason, 32 App. Div. 357. ) Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Chiaverini v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Matter of Chiaverini v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH CHIAVERINI, Respondent, for a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1932

Citations

237 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Matter of Welling v. Fullen

( People ex rel. Chamberlain v. Knox, 45 A.D. 518.) The same rule was applied to a laborer who had actually…

Matter of Phillips

The petition in this case contains no allegation showing a valid appointment of the petitioner under the…