From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chase v. Suffolk Cty. Police Commr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1986
121 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 30, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced service as a police officer with the respondent Suffolk County Police Department in June 1969. On November 30, 1983, in settlement of certain pending disciplinary charges, the petitioner voluntarily agreed to be placed on probationary status for a period of one year with the penalty of dismissal to be imposed if he violated the probation "by being a further subject of a disciplinary action". Subsequently, during the probationary period, a supervisor's complaint report was made against the petitioner for reporting late for duty and falling asleep on two occasions while on duty on July 22, 1984. In August 1984, the petitioner voluntarily accepted the command discipline proposed for the violations of the department's rules and procedures, pleaded guilty to the charges and forfeited five days' accrued time. Thereafter, the respondent Suffolk County Police Commissioner dismissed the petitioner from service for violating his disciplinary probation pursuant to the November 30, 1983, settlement agreement, based upon the subsequent command discipline.

On this appeal, the petitioner claims that he did not understand that command discipline would constitute a violation of his disciplinary probation under the terms of the settlement agreement. However, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the respondents' determination that the petitioner knowingly and voluntarily agreed to the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement (see, Matter of Miller v Coughlin, 59 N.Y.2d 490, 494), and knew or should have known that command discipline would constitute a violation of probation. After having agreed to this settlement and admittedly violating the rules and procedures of the department, the petitioner cannot be heard to complain that he was unlawfully dismissed from his employment under the terms of the agreement. Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Chase v. Suffolk Cty. Police Commr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1986
121 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Chase v. Suffolk Cty. Police Commr

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND F. CHASE, Appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Glatzer v. Bear, Stearns Co.

Although now pro se, at the time of the signing of the Written Agreement and throughout the pendency of his…