From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Charpentier v. Rossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
264 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 2, 1999.

Appeal from the Family Court, Richmond County (Richardson, J.).


Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court ( see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The father's interference with the relationship between the child and the mother cannot be condoned ( see, Maloney v. Maloney, 208 A.D.2d 603). However, the child is now over 17 years of age, has lived with her father since the instant proceeding was commenced in 1995, and has expressed a strong preference for remaining with him. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the award of custody to the father was not proper under the circumstances ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 172).

The mother's remaining contention is without merit.

Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Charpentier v. Rossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
264 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Charpentier v. Rossman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEFFREY CHARPENTIER, Respondent-Appellant, v. REGINA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 2, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 109

Citing Cases

In re David Schick

Despite repeated attempts by the Family Court over several years to ameliorate the alienation, and some…

White v. Stone

best interests of the children" ( Matter of Hight v. Hight, 19 A.D.3d 1159, 1160, 796 N.Y.S.2d 494 [4th Dept.…