From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catterson v. Pell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 13, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the disputed property lay within the borders of the Shinnecock Indian Reservation. Accordingly, the appellants are intruders on Indian lands, and their removal is warranted (see, Indian Law § 8).

The appellants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal.

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Catterson v. Pell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Catterson v. Pell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES M. CATTERSON, JR., as District Attorney of Suffolk…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 794

Citing Cases

In re Thomas

Matter of Spota v Jackson, 37 AD3d 841, reversed. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead ( Karla Lato…

In re Matter of Spota

However, in 2005 Jackson's brother asked the Tribal Council to have the respondent removed and, at the…