From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Catterson v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 8, 1996

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.).


Motions by the respondents to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motions, it is

Ordered that the motions are denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, and the respondent John J.J. Jones, Jr., is prohibited from enforcing the order dated May 8, 1996.

The respondent Judge John J.J. Jones, Jr., acted in excess of his authorized powers in requiring the People to disclose the subject witness statements since such disclosure is authorized neither by statute or case law ( see, CPL 240.20; see also, People v. Dukes, 156 A.D.2d 203). Thus the writ of prohibition is hereby granted ( see, Matter of Hynes v. Cirigliano, 180 A.D.2d 659). Bracken, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Catterson v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1996
229 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Catterson v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES M. CATTERSON, JR., as District Attorney of Suffolk…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 573

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

If the People are or become aware of any material which is arguably exculpatory but they are not willing to…

People v. Dean

To any further extent, including regarding the production of Rosario material at this time, discovery is…