Opinion
October 16, 1997
Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.).
Given the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing, it was a proper exercise of the Family Court's discretion to place appellant in a limited secure facility ( see, Family Ct Act § 141; Matter of James S., 219 A.D.2d 569). We note our consideration of the presentment agency's representation at oral argument that appellant has been placed in a facility where she receives psychiatric care. We find this to be an important component of the court's order, one that was recommended in the Mental Health Services Report.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.