From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Caruso v. Nassau Cnty. Bd. of Elctns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1992
186 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 15, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant proceeding for lack of jurisdiction due to the petitioner's failure to comply with the service provisions of the order to show cause (see, Election Law § 16-116; Matter of Diamond v Power, 21 A.D.2d 660; Matter of Tenneriello v Board of Elections, 125 Misc.2d 190, revd on other grounds, 104 A.D.2d 467).

We have examined the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Caruso v. Nassau Cnty. Bd. of Elctns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1992
186 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Caruso v. Nassau Cnty. Bd. of Elctns

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL B. CARUSO, Appellant, v. NASSAU COUNTY BOARD OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 56

Citing Cases

Stern v. The Putnam Cnty. Bd. of Elections

A special proceeding commenced pursuant to Election Law article 16 must be heard upon such notice to such…

Matter of Gold v. Lasher

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Supreme Court properly dismissed…