In Matter of Caron v. Ash (28 A.D.2d 648) decided by this court on May 22, 1967 the question of constitutionality of the statute was not raised in the Family Court, and was not considered dispositive in this court by reason of the right of the children of the marriage to relief, perforce of the Family Court Act (§ 461) even if their mother had no standing to enforce a Mexican decree.
Summary of this case from Matter of Seitz v. DrogheoDecided May 22, 1967
ORDER AFFIRMED
In Matter of Caron v. Ash (28 A.D.2d 648) decided by this court on May 22, 1967 the question of constitutionality of the statute was not raised in the Family Court, and was not considered dispositive in this court by reason of the right of the children of the marriage to relief, perforce of the Family Court Act (§ 461) even if their mother had no standing to enforce a Mexican decree.
Summary of this case from Matter of Seitz v. DrogheoFull title:CARON, MATTER OF, v. ASH
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: May 22, 1967
In Matter of Potak v. Potak ( 26 A.D.2d 950) the constitutionality of subdivision (c) of section 466 FCT of…