From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Caligiuri v. Maisel, Hefernan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 18, 1950
94 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Argued August 18, 1950

Decided August 18, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, POWERS, J.

Jule L. Maisel, in person, and Charles Kleinberg for appellants.

George Rosling for respondent.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Beatrice Dunn of counsel), for Board of Elections of the City of New York, respondent.


Order affirmed upon the ground that the findings in respect of the domiciles of the appellants are not without support in the evidence. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Caligiuri v. Maisel, Hefernan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 18, 1950
94 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Caligiuri v. Maisel, Hefernan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS J. CALIGIURI, Respondent, against JULE L. MAISEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 18, 1950

Citations

94 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1950)
94 N.E.2d 253

Citing Cases

People v. Douglas

There is no question that the Legislature did not intend the strict definition of "residence" that is found…

Matter of Holzberger v. Schoentag

Respondent concedes that under the foregoing statutes, as a Supervisor of the Town of Beekman he had to be a…